跳到正文
原文
arXiv q-bio.NC 预印本· Xuan-The Tran, Thien-Nhan Vo, Son-Tung Vu, Thoa-Thi Tran, Manh-Dat Nguyen, Thomas Do, Chin-Teng Lin·· 9 天前精选AI 评分62

系统综述:EEG的个体间与个体内变异

Inter- and Intra-Subject Variability in EEG: A Systematic Survey

AI 导读

一篇arXiv预印本系统综述梳理了EEG在静息态、事件相关电位(ERP)及任务/BCI范式(含运动想象与SSVEP)中的个体间与个体内变异。依据摘要,个体间差异通常大于个体内波动,但两者都影响推断与模型泛化;稳定性依赖特征,alpha频段指标与个体alpha峰频率往往较可靠,高频和许多连接性指标可靠性更不一致,ERP可靠性随成分而异,P300常呈中等至较好稳定性。

推荐理由

该综述系统梳理了EEG个体间与个体内变异在静息态、ERP和BCI范式中的表现及量化方法,可为EEG研究设计与报告规范提供参考;结论基于摘要,全文细节未核。

摘要

arXiv:2602.01019v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) underpins neuroscience, clinical neurophysiology, and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), yet pronounced inter- and intra-subject variability limits reliability, reproducibility, and translation. This systematic review studies that quantified or modeled EEG variability across resting-state, event-related potentials (ERPs), and task-related/BCI paradigms (including motor imagery and SSVEP) in healthy and clinical cohorts. Across paradigms, inter-subject differences are typically larger than within-subject fluctuations, but both affect inference and model generalization. Stability is feature-dependent: alpha-band measures and individual alpha peak frequency are often relatively reliable, whereas higher-frequency and many connectivity-derived metrics show more heterogeneous reliability; ERP reliability varies by component, with P300 measures frequently showing moderate-to-good stability. We summarize major sources of variability (biological, state-related, technical, and analytical), review common quantification and modeling approaches (e.g., ICC, CV, SNR, generalizability theory, and multivariate/learning-based methods), and provide recommendations for study design, reporting, and harmonization. Overall, EEG variability should be treated as both a practical constraint to manage and a meaningful signal to leverage for precision neuroscience and robust neurotechnology.

中文翻译还没有生成,先显示原文。

来源:arXiv q-bio.NC 预印本 · arxiv.org