跳到正文
原文
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology·· 2026-05-04精选AI 评分60

网络心理干预中的治疗联盟:系统综述与相关多水平元分析

Alliance in internet-based interventions: A systematic review and correlation multilevel meta-analysis.

AI 导读

一项相关多水平元分析汇总40个独立样本、82个效应量(共2864名参与者),发现网络心理干预中治疗联盟与治疗结果的总体关联为小到中等(r = .21)。依据摘要,工作联盟量表子维度分析显示任务(r = .25)和目标(r = .19)对结果的预测强于情感联结(r = .12),提示网络干预中的联盟更偏重认知—协作成分。

推荐理由

汇总 40 个独立样本、2864 名被试的 82 个效应量,用多层元分析比较工作同盟各分量表与网络干预效果的关系。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Internet-based interventions (IBIs) offer scalable, low-threshold treatment options for mental health care. The therapeutic alliance is a key collaborative quality in psychological therapy, yet its role and structure in IBIs remain debated. METHOD: This correlational meta-analysis synthesizes the overall alliance-outcome association (k = 82 effect sizes nested in s = 40 independent samples; n = 2,864 participants) and its variability across the Working Alliance Inventory subscales using meta-analytic multilevel models. RESULTS: The overall association was small to moderate (r = .21) confirming the relevance of alliance in digital contexts. Subscale-specific analyses showed that task (r = .25) and goal (r = .19) were more predictive of treatment outcomes than bond (r = .12), highlighting a shift toward cognitive-collaborative components in IBIs. Even exploratory in nature, none of the examined moderators (diagnosis, alliance rater, face-to-face contact, therapeutic approach, publication year, and country) systematically influenced the effect size. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the robustness of the prediction of the alliance on outcomes observed in the general literature and at the same time point to the particular qualities of using IBIs. Future work is needed to adapt the conceptualization and assessment of alliance in IBI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译还没有生成,先显示原文。

来源:Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi.org